Manila walks fine line between Beijing and Washington in South China Sea

Regional News
  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

(South China Morning Post) — Under its vocally anti-American President Rodrigo Duterte, the Philippines has emerged as a focal point between China and the U.S. in their continuing contest for dominance in the region.

After years of cozier ties between Manila and Beijing, at the expense of the Philippines' traditional alliance with the U.S., Duterte last month appeared to signal a retreat from his anti-Washington stance by reversing an earlier decision to scrap a key military agreement with the U.S. in June.


While analysts say Duterte is unlikely to change his policy on China any time soon, the shift to reinstate the Visiting Forces Agreement — which gives legal status to U.S. troops stationed in the country — underlines the difficult balancing act the Philippines must strike in its dealings with the two powers.


As tensions have flared between China and the U.S., the Philippines has become part of their strategic confrontation amid Beijing's growing aggression in the resource-rich South China Sea — also one of the world's busiest shipping routes — where China's claims to most of the waters are disputed by the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan.


Washington needs the support of Manila and other key partners in Southeast Asia in its efforts to push back on Beijing's ambitions in the region. For China, maintaining ties with the Philippines is equally important amid its rising confrontation with the U.S.


The U.S. took a stronger stance in the middle of July when Secretary of State Mike Pompeo declared support for the 2016 ruling by an international tribunal which rejected most of Beijing's claims in the South China Sea.


It was a historic victory for the Philippines, which took the dispute to The Hague, but China has never accepted the decision. Beijing said the latest U.S. policy statement on the issue "deliberately stokes territorial and maritime disputes."


The Philippines backed the U.S. stance, calling on China to accept the ruling. In his State of the Union address on Monday, Duterte argued the Philippines was "neither beholden nor a pawn to anyone" in the South China Sea, but also made clear the country was not prepared to go to war over its competing claims with Beijing.


"China is claiming it," he said. "We are claiming it. China has the arms, we do not have the arms. So, it is simple as that. They are in possession of the property."


In addition to their rivalry in the South China Sea, China and the U.S. both have clear trade and investment interests in their relations with the Philippines.


Beijing has long sought to increase its leverage in the maritime disputes and related ongoing discussions for a code of conduct in the South China Sea by winning over its Southeast Asian nations on the economic front.


China has wooed the Philippines with investments under its Belt and Road Initiative — Chinese President Xi Jinping's signature development strategy — and was its top trading partner last year.


On the other hand, Washington has sought to counter growing Chinese influence in the region with its Indo-Pacific strategy which includes more frequent freedom of navigation exercises in the contested waters.


The U.S. and the Philippines, an American colony from 1898 to 1946, have deep historical ties, with a mutual defense treaty dating back to 1951 and a military relationship which has continued since the closure in 1992 of the American naval base at Subic Bay and the Clark Air Base in Pampanga, north of Manila.


On taking office in 2016, Duterte pivoted the Philippines towards Beijing, vowing to set aside the tribunal finding in exchange for Chinese investment. In October that year, he travelled to Beijing for a meeting with Xi and declared "America has lost now" and he had "realigned myself in your ideological flow."


In February Duterte made his biggest move in distancing the Philippines from its historical ally when he announced the termination of the Visiting Forces Agreement.


It was an angry response to the revocation of a US visa for a former police chief who helped to lead Duterte's bloody war on drugs, although the official reason was to diversify foreign relations.


The move — which U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper described as "unfortunate" —  complicated Washington's efforts to push Beijing into following international law in the region.


Months later in June — after resistance from within his government — Duterte reversed course. His Foreign Affairs Secretary Teddy Locsin said the decision to reinstate the agreement was a response to "vast and swiftly changing circumstances of the world in a time of pandemic and heightened superpower tensions."


Derek Grossman, senior defense analyst at the Washington-based think tank Rand Corporation, said Beijing was likely to be increasingly concerned that the Philippines could turn anew to the U.S. to hedge against Chinese assertiveness — particularly as Manila had officially endorsed the U.S. shift in its South China Sea policy.


"That said, Duterte's latest statement — that China controls the South China Sea — seems to have been timed to throw cold water on the notion that the Philippines is once again happily conducting alliance relations with the U.S.," he said.


"As we know well, Duterte is extremely anti-American and has been seeking ways to diversify Filipino foreign and security policy away from over-reliance on the U.S."


Public sentiment in the Philippines has long been pro-U.S., but Grossman said there had recently been a "further souring" of opinion on China, for reasons "ranging from suspicions about coronavirus, the South China Sea, illicit Chinese activities in the Philippines such as gambling and human trafficking allegations and potential distrust for Belt and Road projects in the Philippines."


Jeffrey Ordaniel, assistant professor of international security at Tokyo International University, said Beijing was wary of any strengthening of treaty commitments between the U.S. and the Philippines, noting that their mutual defense treaty covered the South China Sea.


"The Philippines' South China Sea policy has been largely determined by Duterte's parochial concerns, characterized by his deep-seated anti-U.S. sentiments and favorable view of China," he said.


"The weakening or strengthening of the U.S.-Philippine alliance is obviously an important determinant of how far China could continue to push the envelope in the South China Sea."


Ordaniel said Duterte was unlikely to change tack on his approach to China, but noted the strongman leader had less than two years left in office.


"The 2022 election will be pretty significant for China and the U.S. Many are expecting or hoping for the pendulum to swing back — for the Philippines to align itself again with America."

November 2020 pssnewsletter

previous arrow
next arrow

Read more articles

Visit our Facebook Page

previous arrow
next arrow